Case study · Architecture + design

They knew the work felt harder than it should

Studio PCH had a proven design point of view. But too much knowledge still lived in people’s heads, projects were being reinvented, and recurring finance work was taking leadership time.

By Josh WeissPublished 2026-08-26Reviewed 2026-08-27
Studio PCH hospitality design project

Studio PCH is a 25-person Venice, California architecture and hospitality design firm. The Busywork Audit found a familiar growth problem: exceptional work was being delivered through expertise that lived in people rather than systems.

Observed30%Rework on assigned tasks
Observed20 hrsWeekly manual finance work
Identified$150–200KPotential annual opportunity
Evidence label

The $150–200K figure is an opportunity identified through the audit, not a claim of savings already realized.

What kept making the work harder

Projects repeatedly started from scratch. Knowledge was difficult to pass on, delegation could create another review cycle, and important decisions flowed through a small number of people. The issue was not talent. The firm needed a better way to capture and reuse what its people already knew.

Pattern 01

Knowledge lived in people

Without shared documentation, hard-won project knowledge was difficult to find and reuse.

Pattern 02

Delegation created rework

Managers spent time packaging, explaining, and reviewing work that should have moved more cleanly.

Pattern 03

Growth hit key-person limits

Critical decisions bottlenecked through a few leaders, constraining capacity.

Pattern 04

Finance stayed manual

Recurring finance activity consumed roughly twenty hours each week.

“We wanted to understand the key changes we could make to increase efficiency—both in how we work individually and how our staff operates as a team.” — Melinda Prisco, Director of Operations

Audit before automation

Clearworks interviewed stakeholders, mapped acquisition, delivery, and operations workflows, reviewed the technology and security environment, and modeled the value of each opportunity. The roadmap deliberately mixed lower-risk immediate moves with larger operating changes.

The decision principle

Do not automate an unclear workflow. First make the work visible, then decide what should be documented, redesigned, connected, or automated.

What changed first

The assessment created shared language. “SOP” entered the firm’s operating vocabulary. Melinda documented one recurring complex workflow and reported that the single change was already saving hours per month. Leadership also gained a clearer view of the tradeoff between incremental software spending and the time opportunity identified by the audit.

“Working with Clearworks has helped us not only identify but also clearly name some of our biggest challenges—and as the saying goes, ‘naming the problem is the first step toward solving it.’” — Melinda Prisco

What this means for another firm

If every project feels like reinvention, the constraint may be knowledge transfer rather than individual performance. A useful assessment makes that pattern concrete, sizes the opportunity, and gives leaders options they can sequence without overwhelming the team.

← See all case studies

Your firm

Find the part that keeps slowing people down.

Bring one piece of work that keeps coming back.

Start a conversation →